Thursday, June 30, 2016
Not really, most people are just annoyed at all the construction that is bogging the downtown area.
I'm trying really hard to care about this project, and I want to think its gonna be a great thing for El Paso, but the more I think about it, the more it annoys me.
Its an incredibly expensive project that will transport relatively few people. Its another hipster feel-good project, but when you look at who really uses public transit on a regular basis you'd understand why I'm annoyed.
There is no practical reason that the BRIO was done on the westside before other parts of town but we all know why it was done first.
Alameda should've been the priority because the valley has more public transit users than other part of town, but this town routinely ignores this part of town.
And so why many of you may genuinely be excited about the trolly, I get annoyed because I go down Alameda every day and there are very few bus stops with shade.
I see the riders, mostly women - seniors or moms with small children, having to face the heat without shade and I think about the obscene amount of money spent on the frivolity of the trolly that only goes from UTEP to the border. Think about how many shaded bus stops that money would buy.
But those moms and little old ladies aren't as cool as hipsters right?
Tuesday, June 28, 2016
We lost and the stakes in this election are too high to play Bernie or bust.
For full disclosure, I don't support an assault weapons ban. I don't think it solves the problem. But I acknowledge, like basically anyone else in the country with two brain cells to rub together, that the number of mass shootings, and crimes committed with guns, is a national problem that needs to be addressed.
The fact that the GOP won't even take up a vote underscores the importance of ensuring we have a balance of power in Washington.
There are a few other important reasons why Bernie or bust is counterproductive, but let me address the elephant in the room.
I'm not a fan of Hillary Clinton. If you follow me on social media then you know that. She's all the things people say about her, dishonest, untrustworthy, entitled, only committed to the values of the party when it suits her, flip-flops, sold-out unions, dishonest, difficult to like and dishonest.
The problem is Donald Trump. The reality is that so many people hate Hillary that they are willing to forgo their values and good sense to vote for a racist, self-centered, greedy, and dangerous mo-fo like Trump.
Every vote that Hillary doesn't get, benefits Trump. If you don't understand that, then you just don't understand election math.
There are two types of Bernie supporters (mostly). The younger ones are millennials and hold no allegiance to the Democratic Party. They are liberal, but they would just as well be socialists as Democrats. Then there are the older really progressive liberals. Some of them are hippies, some are yuppies, and some are one issue voters (environmentalists, union people, social justice people). They don't all fall nice and neat into those two groups, but for the most part, thats how they roll.
The younger ones tend to be the Bernie or Bust people, although there are a fair amount of the older ones that are just sick and tired of the Party not being "left-enough". Admittedly, I'd fall into that category, if it weren't for Trump.
The older liberal progressives are probably a little more pragmatic and want to pull the Party back to our liberal roots. They will more easily vote for the nominee because they have been around since before McGovern and understand that you have to win an general election.
Look Bernie or Busters, I get it. You want very much to stick to your guns and the thought of voting for Hillary turns your stomach.
It turns mine too.
But you have to look at the bigger picture here. We have to stop Trump at any costs. The man is a danger to this country. No patriot would ever want that idiot to have his finger on the bomb.
So don't look at it like your voting for Hillary (even though you must), look at it as your blocking Trump from winning. Sadly, its like being a Cowboy fan. Not in the playoffs, but at the end of the year you're just trying to salvage a little dignity in being a spoiler.
Any vote that goes to anyone but Hillary at this point helps Trump. You aren't sending a message if you don't make a sizable dent in anything and Green Party candidates and Libertarians NEVER make a dent. No one every remembers them. They never accomplish anything. They become the Ralph Nader of history. Smart guy that is ultimately right, but ineffective because he can't get elected.
I know you won't like hearing this and right now you are losing your shit over reading this, but Bernie or Bust is ultimately counter-productive. Especially if enough of them stay home and don't vote or blow their vote on the Green Party or worse, the Libertarian.
Trump doesn't have enough support in his own party to win. He is depending on bringing out other people and like it or not, you're contributing to that guy if you take away votes for Hillary.
So here is how its going to go down. I'm very, very, very reluctantly going to vote for Hillary. Liker Bernie Sanders himself. Hopefully she wins.
She will be a disaster and be a one-term president and the Republicans will get their collective shit together in 4 years and take back the White House.
But its the next 4 years that are the most critical because of one other really important urgency...the Supreme Court.
For the first time in a couple of generations its actually possible to have a majority of liberals on the Supreme Court, which would make this country a lot better place to live.
The stakes are really high in this election. Do you want Trump shaping the future of the Supreme Court, or do you want a Democrat doing so, even if it is Hillary?
As they say at the end of every episode of Epic Rap Battle of History, YOU DECIDE!
SIDEBAR: I know its been awhile since I've written anything and as a result, my bitches in the blogosphere haven't written much either. But hey, since I wrote something, they can all now get back to blogging. You're welcome El Paso.
Saturday, June 18, 2016
Whenever I hear those sounds I think of my dad. Its the sound of playing catch with him when I was a kid. My dad lived for baseball the way I do for boxing. And he was damn good too.
He'd always threw the ball too hard for me. I was terrified. The whiifff sound was the noise the ball made as it cut through the air on its way towards my head. Snap was the sound when it hit my glove, usually followed by some grunt of pain from under my breath.
I hated playing catch with my dad when I was little. But I learned from it. I learned that life wasn't ever going to take it easy on you and that if you didn't learn how to catch life's problems, even if it hurts a little bit, its better than letting it hit you right between the eyes.
As I got older, I learned even more. I learned that once you catch that ball, turn around and fire back as hard as you can. I can still remember the first time I did that too. I was 11 and playing little league. I finally stopped being afraid of the balls my dad threw and starting getting mad. My dad could see it on my face. He saw my eyes water with anger. He even asked me, "Are you getting mad son?"
"Yes!" I screamed.
Now I was embarrassed because it was in front of the rest of the team.
"Then do something about it Rag Arm". That was my nickname during baseball season because I couldn't throw as well as my kid brother.
I think he threw it even harder that time. I reared back and let it loose, straight at my dad's face. I wanted to catch him right between the eyes.
He caught it like it was a routine catch. Lesson: When somebody gives it to you, give it back and aim for the head.
After we were done my dad walked up to me, pulled my cap down over my eyes and said, "'Bout time Rag Arm". He had a million nicknames for me. Actually for everyone. None of the siblings in my family are called by their real name on a regular basis except me. Pedro is Pete, Margarita is Maga, Relles is Ray Boy, Pablo is Paulie, Eleanor is Lala, and Helen is Pima.
Now I don't know if my dad was actually trying to teach me something that day or not, but I learned a lot.
He loved baseball so much that when we were kids my dad would take us out of school to go catch opening day of spring training every year. At that time it was the only professional baseball in Arizona. He had a beer and peanuts. We shared a soda and a big red licorice rope.
Our political conversations were very much the same. It was a lot like playing catch. Only the older I got, the better I got at catching and firing back. My dad was the best prep for talk radio ever. He made me defend any position I took starting at a young age. Eventually I became better at it than he was.
But I could never throw harder.
I miss my dad, like many of you that no longer have yours. And if you know me personally, then you know I really looked up to my dad. We all tend to idealize people once they're gone and I guess I am the victim of a little hero worship of my pop. But if you are going to hero worship, why not let it be someone who shaped your life?
My earliest memory of my father was when my Tata Remigio died. Remigio is my middle name and it might as well have been my first name because we were so close. Closer than I was to my father at the time.
My dad was the one who broke the news to me about his passing. I remember it was the first time someone tried to explain the concept of death to me. I started crying when they lowered the casket in the ground. My dad nudged me and whispered in my ear, "Abeytia's don't cry."
That became something my dad said to his children and grandchildren regularly. It became a saying in the family, usually when one of the kids fell down, scraped a knee, or was throwing a fit about something.
Fast-forward to September 13, 1994 at Baptist Medical Center in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. I was a 19 year old soldier at the time and a newly wed. I had married my first wife, Sandra Abeytia in February. She had complications in her pregnancy and they had to take the baby out early to try to save her.
We were hundreds of miles away from home and family. My dad was the first family member from either side of the family to show up when she first entered the hospital from Fort Sill a couple weeks before. We'd take turns sitting by bedsides, either my wife's or our baby girls. I named her Sandra after her mother. She was born on August 29th, and after a couple of weeks fighting for her life, my wife died.
My dad had gone back to Arizona during that time and my mother had come and gone as well. It was a lot of time off of work for them to take off and it turned out that none of my family was there with me when she passed away. I drove home alone to Arizona to bury my wife.
I was 19 and suddenly a widower and single dad. My parents and family nursed me through that time. I tried to hold back the tears, I guess out of some stupid idea of what it meant to be strong. But I broke lose when my dad put his hand on my shoulder and told me it was okay to cry.
Its still a bad habit I have. I still try to hold things in because "Abeytia's don't cry".
A few years later, my Nana passed away. She was my dad's mother-in-law. My father cried. I put my arms around him and told him, "Abeytia's don't cry."
I made a lot of bad decisions in my life and my dad was always there. Either to scold me, tell me I told ya so, or to just listen. Sometimes to get drunk with and listen to sad oldies or mariachi songs. And sometimes, to just play catch.
My dad had health scares since he was in his 30's and had a quadruple by-pass. Every couple of years there after, my dad was in the hospital for this or for that. After a while, you harden up to health scares. Eventually we had strange conversations like, "Hey, dad's in the hospital again."
"Is it serious?"
"Nah, just another heart attack."
But toward the end of his life, the hospital stays and brushes with death become more and more regular. I took advantage of what my dad once called "over-time". The last visit I had with my pop was the Thanksgiving before he passed. I sat and talked with him for hours about every beef I ever had with him. From throwing the ball too hard, to mistreating my mother, to hitting us too often and too hard when we were little.
My dad apologized for every wrong he'd ever done and I apologized for everything I had ever done. I hugged him and we cried. And I told him, "Stop dad, Abeytia's don't cry."
He said, "then stop being a pussy and quit your crying."
We both laughed.
The rest of the time I spent with him then was spent just listening to and documenting stories of his activist days. I recorded them and I listen to them every Father's Day and his birthday.
Dad died the following February. Before he died I got a phone call from my tia telling me that it was time to come home because my dad only had a few hours left. Pop hung around for 13 days. Everyone got a chance to say their good-byes to him.
Dad was a die-hard Dodger fan. At some point later in the day when my dad died, someone noticed what the day was. It was the day that pitchers and catchers reported for spring training. It all made sense.
He asked me to give his eulogy. Up until recently, it was the hardest thing I ever had to do. I literally bit back the tears as I eulogized my father. I kept hearing my dad's voice in my head saying "Abeytia's don't cry".
Dad loved his grandchildren more than anything. The stern disciplinarian with a short temper and a long belt was quickly replaced by a gentle Tata with an abundance of patience and affection for the second generation.
I often wonder if every father looks at their kids the same way I do. I wonder if every other dad thinks their kids are the most beautiful, handsome, intelligent, kind-hearted, and talented kids God ever put on this planet. I guess we can't all be right about that, but luckily I am.
I can't be with my kiddos this Father's Day and those of you that are my friends know I'm going through some tough times right now. I wish I could be with them. I wish I had them with me.
And I wish I had one more day with my dad. I could use his consejos right now.
Most of all, I could use one more good game of catch.
I love and miss you dearly Dad.
Friday, June 17, 2016
1. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, no matter her intentions, has not led the DNC forward and should be replaced at the earliest moment when a transition won't harm our chances of winning in November.
2. The DNC should create a special speakers bureau to help local parties raise money. Imagine how much more successful our annual spaghetti dinner would be with an exciting special guest that had his or her expenses paid for at no cost to our County Party.
3. Hillary being the presumptive nominee should mean that her supporters are in the driver's seat at the national level. But let's remember that the Sanders crew, especially the young ones hould have a hand on the wheel as they learn the ropes. While we put the pedal to the metal towards a demolition derby with Trump in November. So let's reform our primaries to better educate and include a young, progressive movement while finding ways to place interested upcoming young campaign staffers in places we might not normally expect to find Democrats to begin planting BLUEbonnet seeds across Texas and other states.
To conclude, thought this isn't about resumès, I have had the privileged experience of leading several winning campaigns, most recently as Justice-elect Palafox's right hand in an area that's spans 17 West Texas counties, and I will vet candidates based on their knowledge of the issues challenging our progress in Texas and willingness to try new methods that can help move the party forward. Please support me if you support these ideas or ones like them that can make our party live up to its inclusive, democratic and progressive ideals.
Wednesday, June 15, 2016
If you recall, Tom Buchino is a candidate for sheriff and I posted his cheesy internet video where he fires off a few rounds from his pistol to demonstrate how he's a "straight shooter".
Doesn't actually show if he is a straight shooter or not, but I guess that is beside the point.
So lets talk about being a straight shooter shall we?
I've seen a few of his signs around town and if you see a white pick-up with the logo all over it, that is the EPSOA Union Boss Sgt Horstman. Looks good on his truck to be honest.
But if you look at his logo:
Well its not what is there. Its what is NOT there.
Mr. Straight Shooter forgets to mention his party affiliation. Buchino is a Republican but he doesn't include it on his signs.
Frankly, its pretty smart. In a general election in which Donald Trump is going to ensure that there is an increase in turnout because Latinos hate the guy, it makes sense to not mention you're a Republican.
I mean voters are going to see it on the ballot when they vote, so he's still screwed, but his strategy makes sense. Except that you can't HIDE your party affiliation and call yourself a straight shooter at the same time.
Next we will talk about something on his website that caught my eye.
Its gonna be even harder for Buchino to hide from the GOP label when he uses campaign rhetoric similar to Donald Trump. Here's a screenshot from his website.
The anti-political correctness was all fine and dandy during the primary when the Republicans were doing their ritual of trying to out-stupid and out-bigot each other, but its a whole other ball game in the general.
Especially in Blue El Paso.
Everyone reading "I believe political correctness must take a back seat to the protection of our citizens" will know that is Republican dog-whistle for an anti-immigrant stance.
I guess it makes sense now why the Samaniego's are endorsing him.
Yeah, I said it...Y Que?
Monday, June 13, 2016
Cowboy hat, check.
Tight blue jeans, check.
Saying you're a "straight-shooter", check.
And now, to complete the picture, shooting a firearm during his commercial.
Seriously, he did that. Just watch.
My favorite part of the spot isn't just the overly-exaggerated tactical engagement, is the fact that he doesn't show whether or not he even hit the target.
I'm assuming because he's a green beret, he hit it. But I guess we just have to take his word for it that he's a "straight-shooter".
But is he in fact a straight-shooter?
I ask because one thing that isn't mentioned in his commercial is that he's essentially devoid of any real law-enforcement experience. Tactical experience is one thing, but law enforcement is different.
And he apparently doesn't have any.
Being a sheriff for "all of El Paso County" means understanding you are not in a tactical environment. This community is not a war zone. This is a community in which development of trust between the Sheriff's Office and the community has been a big part of keeping this community safe.
Interestingly, and perhaps because Buchino is used to the almost endless resources available to the military, he has been critical of the fact that Wiles has said his loyalty lies with the tax-payers of El Paso County.
I'm not sure how that was supposed to be a bad thing, but its funny to hear a Republican that is endorsed by a union be critical of a Democrat that is looking out for the tax payer. Here's the reality that very few in law enforcement will admit to.
We spend a shit-ton of money on law enforcement. In fact, its infuriating for tax payers to have to pay for the same service repeatedly and essentially the time that its acceptable. If you live in the city of El Paso, as most of you reading this do, I'm about to really piss you off. But here's the truth, you pay for your security repeatedly. You pay for federal security forces (Customs and Border Patrol, DEA, FBI, and the military), you pay for municipal police, you pay for school district police, you pay for community college police, you pay for constables, and you pay for the sheriff. You get one service, law enforcement, but you have to pay a lot of people for it.
Imagine if you had to do the same thing with water or electricity? You get one gallon coming out of your tap, or one hour of power coming out of your socket, but you have to pay several entities for one service? Would that make any sense to you?
No. So its a good thing that the Sheriff wants to keep the tax payer in mind.
I don't for one second believe that the endorsement of a Republican was unanimous amongst the membership. But for the sake of argument, let's say it was.
Saturday, June 11, 2016
He does what he's instructed to by Forma in order to try to create a narrative. The purpose is to try to damage Houghton as much as they can because they are likely to be the consultants for Dee Margo's bid for mayor.
And Ali has been doing Forma's bidding to try to prop up Margo for years. You see when he wasn't stabbing his own boss in the back to spread bad shit about her to media WHILE HE WAS WORKING FOR HER, he was doing Forma's bidding online going back to the second Margo-Moody campaign.
Maybe he was upset that Chavez had him play taxi driver, or walk HD while the mutt pooped on the capitol lawn and clean up after the dog, or because she made him fetch her food from lobbyists and Dr Peppers. Who knows.
What is most interesting is the idea that Dee Margo is a viable candidate for mayor to begin with.
Sure, its a non-partisan race. But what people apparently misunderstand, most especially Libertarians and Republicans, is that El Paso is a town of Democratic values. As much as folks might like to think otherwise, El Pasoans aren't stupid and don't just vote Democratic because their ancestors did. You're insulting the electorate you're hoping will support you when you say stupid shit like that. The reality is, El Pasoans prefer Democratic Party values. There's no way around that.
Yes, in general the electorate of municipal races tends to be more conservative than other elections, but they are still very much in the minority. How in the world does Forma plan to overcome the fact that Dee Margo is known as the main Republican bad guy in town?
It would take a level of re-branding that is unheard of to try to make that guy viable. Obviously there is too much unknown right now to even calculate how to make the rebranding happen. First of all, because their job would be a whole lot easier to rebrand Margo if he was in a field of old white guys. But that isn't likely.
Plus, the negatives against Margo are a lay-up. Way too easy to highlight and remind voters about.
Now personally I don't recall ever having met Ted Houghton, so I honestly can't say what I think about the guy. I only know what he's done. El Paso has a lot more infrastructure now and Houghton is a big reason why. Hell I don't even know if Houghton is a Republican, but if he is, he's not synonymous with the word like Margo is to El Pasoans.
Maybe Ali is upset because Houghton didn't tip him when Chavez had him play taxi for him, or maybe he is upset because Houghton ignored him like everyone else in Austin did, but whatever it is it seems directed by Forma.
But Forma's biggest problem is that Margo is El Paso's answer to Donald Trump. And it will take a really long time to redefine someone who even shares the same first name as Trump.
Yes, Donald is his real first name.
Gotta love the irony.
Wednesday, June 8, 2016
Mr. Holguin was a very nice man and he voted regularly despite his age and health. The last time I saw him vote was at Pavo Real when his son Eddie Holguin Sr took him to vote.
He was an Army veteran and served in World War II. Mr. Holguin was born in Ysleta when it was still a separate town from El Paso.
Click here for details on his funeral arrangements that will include full military honors at Fort Bliss National Cemetery.
Mr. Holguin was always very nice to people and his passing is a loss for the community.
If you need an address to send flowers or a card or anything, contact me and I'll pass it on to you.
Tuesday, June 7, 2016
Turns out the only thing historic about it was that its all stuff that has been said and done before, but its being pushed by some of the most out-of-touch people I can think of in El Paso...the soccer moms of the pool.
The pool moms are out to show that the community supports embattled city manager Tommy Gonzalez by trying to get 1000 signatures of support for Gonzalez. We are a population of close to 700,000 and some how 1000 is supposed to make it look like El Pasoans support Tommy Boy, huh.
Well good luck with that.
I'm guessing at least 800 of the 1000, assuming they even get 1000 in the first place, are going to be people that are connected to swim teams.
Let me explain why I am even writing this piece in the first place. The reason is, Tommy Gonzalez and his allies on council are trying to push the narrative that Tommy Boy is some city savior that is being crucified and they think he and Romero should've been spared instead of Barrabas.
The reality is that the pool moms sound so completely out of touch with this community while they are trying to save the reputation of Gonzalez. Wake up ladies, you live here. Tommy is gonna leave at some point and you guys are the ones that are going to be left here with his legacy. And trust me, that ain't a good thing.
The pool moms are all about themselves and their pet project, a gucci pool. What they don't realize is that other than upper-cruster westsiders, no one gives a shit about your gucci pool. Most people that use pools in El Paso use them to cool off in the summer.
So here's what I would like the pool moms to explain.
What good has Gonzalez actually done?
You see for all their talk about what Gonzalez has done (for them) they don't realize that it would be the job of ANY city manager to push through quality of life bond projects. Thats their fucking job. Its what they are supposed to do.
But this goes to the logic of the pool moms, Tommy Boy, and Reps Acosta and Noe - how can accomplishments be something Gonzalez gets credit for, but the city's many mistakes are something he never takes responsibility for?
Here's another one, for all of you calling for Joyce Wilson's head for $20 million (not that I disagree by the way), how come you are all silent about $50 million in lost funding under Tommy Boy?
Cue the crickets sound effect.
What is even more unbelievable is City Reps Noe and Acosta's very transparent attempt to try to undo or mitigate the Ethics Commission's action against their boy Tommy.
"I'm still not convinced he did anything wrong whatsoever", Noe told El Paso Inc reporter David Crowder in this article.
Didn't do anything wrong whatsoever? His former colleague and fellow Team Tommy Teammate Larry Romero ADMITTED to wrong-doing in his letter, and somehow the guy that facilitated what Romero admitted to has not done "anything wrong whatsoever"?
Is that a joke?
I'm expecting Noe, Acosta, and others to push forward with some way to undo the action taken by the Ethics Commission for their own individual political expediency.
It frankly boggles the mind that those two members of council don't see how bad of an idea that is.
In an op-ed from the Times, the paper hits the nail on the head about the majority of council not willing to deal with the shortcomings of Gonzalez and then specifically names names - Leeser, Acosta, Noe, Robinson, and Svarzbein.
There's not a single one of them that can realistically expect to attain higher office, or are termed out, which in my mind means they have an even greater responsibility to do all the good they can while they have the opportunity to do so.
David K and the rest of the people out there pushing this stupid idea that Gonzalez is somehow a great city manager and we are all luck to breath the same air as him should be honest about the fact that they all have a movida for supporting Gonzalez and if they didn't have one, they wouldn't be.
Gonzalez was supposed to clean house in the City's Engineering Department which is why the Karlsruhers are going to bat for Tommy. David K leaves that part in all his blog posts about me, but its the truth. They family business, because of the nature of their business, has to deal with the City Engineering Department.
Do the math. Connect the dots. Whatever you want to call it, but there's a reason you hear all this indignation from David K on the topic.
One last note for the swim moms. There's a reason people tune you out. You guys run around complaining about the "deplorable conditions" your kids have to swim in while you're completely blind to the fact that there are farmers that struggle to water their crops in this community and there are families that struggle with connecting to water and wastewater while you guys are complaining about how your pool isn't gucci enough for your standards.
Have you taken a look at what passes for a park in some places? Do you realize that there are dog parks that have better facilities than the conditions of parks some kids in this area have to play in?
So excuse us if your boo-whooing about gucci pools falls on deaf ears. Why don't you take your teams out to other areas of town that have parks that don't have trees or grass so that they can better grasp the term "deplorable conditions".
Friday, June 3, 2016
Sprinkles are for winners as the GEICO commercial says, so lets get straight to the sprinkles shall we?
I have written pretty extensively about how difficult it is for an incumbent to survive a run-off election. So much so that I can only find one instance of it happening in El Paso going all the way back to the 60's. Turns out, some really dirty pool had to be played to make that happen by the way.
But District Attorney Jaime Esparza survived the run-off and the DA's team gets sprinkles. There's no way the DA would've won without a brilliant campaign strategy of field ops. God knows it wasn't his mail, Jesus it was bad. But he made up for terrible mail by a great field program that allowed him to narrowly stave off a challenge from Yvonne Rosales.
Run-offs are hard for incumbents to win because anti-incumbent voters are more likely to go back to the polls because they see a chance at getting rid of the incumbent they don't like. People that are supporters are generally harder to get to go back to the polls because they have less of a sense of urgency to go and vote to keep someone in.
Trust me, the electorate is usually more excited about voting someone out, than voting someone in. Need an example, this year's presidential election. Republicans are going to make sure Hillary doesn't win if she ends up with the nomination. Sane, rational people will show up to make sure Trump doesn't win.
By the way, she gets an honorable mention here as a candidate. She did what all the crazy candidates couldn't do to Esparza, pull him into a run-off and damn near win. Rosales had almost every advantage going into the run-off and if she would've had a better field team, or if people would've believed in her sooner and contributed more, she couldn't pulled it off.
Next person in line for sprinkles, Mike Apodaca. I've been downplaying my buddy Mike's chances of getting Ruben Gonzalez elected to a full term as the Tax Assessor Collector for a myriad of reason. All of which I was right about by the way (two candidates with the same last name, no one cares about the office, etc), but Apodaca was the X factor.
He came up with a brilliant ground strategy that he executed flawlessly. The result was they went into the run-off with more votes and finished the job accordingly.
And the final sprinkles go to whoever made the Palafox victory happen. Since I got way more mail and door knocks from Ramirez, I'm gonna assume that it was in large part due to people just not liking Ramirez very much. Because all in all, I though Ramirez was going to win it based on voter contact I saw.
So if you have sprinkles, you have to have something to give the people that didn't do well right?
I thought long and hard about what to call it and then my mind wondered to the two biggest ass-hats I could think of in the blogosphere, who's very names evoked thoughts of deception and ineptitude.
Obviously I thought of the blogosphere's answer to Bert and Ernie - Martin Paredes and Ali Razavi. So I decided to call the award a blend of their names. No, not the pretend name Ali likes to use, his real one.
So the award for campaign fucks ups shall henceforth be called.... MALI's.
The first MALI goes to Ernesto Bustillos and Josh Dagda. I know I sound like a broken record because they didn't do well with CDA's election, but they also screwed up Siria Rocha's campaign. Frankly even more so than how they underperformed for CDA.
Rocha's mail piece attacking Gonzalez was awful. The "capirotada" piece was trying to do too much and ultimately did nothing. And trust me, there was defiantly a negative message that absolutely couldn't been leveraged against Gonzalez effectively, just not by them. And their constant effort to focus on websites and social media for local elections is just laughable at this point. When was the last time anyone even went to get information about a candidate from a campaign website? No one in El Paso has ever face booked their way to victory.
Ultimately Rocha essentially let them go and told them she didn't need their services anymore, but she waited until it was too late for that decision to have a positive impact on her race.
But there are two things I need to cover before I wrap up this particular MALI.
Bustillos and Dagda should've protected the candidate from herself on another attack piece. The fact that they didn't, shows that they knew it was a mistake and let it happen anyway, or they were completely ignorant to the mistake the piece was. Let me back up and show you want I mean.
This is an example of a poorly executed negative piece. The comparison part is good tactic, so it starts off okay, but as the piece goes on, it just gets worse and worse. Not sure why they called him "Ruben G" but it makes him sound far cooler than he really is. It makes him sound like a back-up rapper, a morning drive-time deejay on a hip-hop station, or one of the voices in Ali's head.
The military section is the big problem and that is where the consultants should've protected the candidate from herself. First, it annoyed me how much both of the candidates kept mentioning their military services. I get it, its the fashionable thing to do so these days. I'm a vet to, but I don't mention it every third word when I'm apply for a job. And neither one of them had an MOS that remotely relevant to the job.
Although Rocha more so than Gonzalez. But that was what has gotten under the skin of a lot of veterans. Under her side of the panel for military she listed three different bullet points - Veteran US Army, Air Defense Artillery, and serving on the EP Veteran's Affairs Advisory Committee.
Under Gonzalez they just list "served".
That is probably the most dishonest characterization of military service I've ever seen in a local campaign. Actually, there is no probably to it. It IS the most dishonest characterization of military service I've seen in a local campaign. And its shameful that it happened in a military community like El Paso.
BT Dubs, serving on an advisory committee is not military experience.
Here's the truth - Gonzalez is a Vietnam Veteran. He was on a helicopter ground crew. That is a big deal and he was in Viet-fucking-nam! This chart makes it sound like some guy who maybe did a two-year hitch as some bullshit clerk for college money and got out. Which isn't the case at all.
Rocha's side says "Air Defense Artillery" - giving the impression that she was an ADA soldier and served in a combat role. It evokes images of being in the deserts of Kuwait or Saudi Arabia during Desert Storm on a SCUD-Buster Crew in full MOPP gear in the sweltering heat keeping soldiers and civilians safe.
Well she wasn't and didn't.
She was a 71L.
Let that sink in for a minute.
For those of you who aren't familiar, a 71L is literally...a fucking secretary! That is what her MOS (military occupational speciality) was while she was in the military.
She was a secretary in a UNIT that was Air Defense Artillery, but SHE was not ADA. Talk about misleading the public! She wasn't shooting down SCUDS, she was filling out leave forms and 4187's, filing paperwork, and taking memo's.
Not that her service was important or honorable.
Again, I think both of their military service is irrelevant to the position, but to imply you were something you weren't, and that your opponent basically did nothing when in reality he was in Viet-fucking-nam is really bad.
Bad, bad, bad, bad.
And the consultants should've stopped her from sending that out because it had a real chance of blowing up in her face. Especially in this town.
The final MALI goes to another person on the Rocha campaign - Ruby Ramirez.
So let me clarify a mistake that was made, a really bad and expensive mistake, that I said was Bustillo's fault. It wasn't his fault entirely.
The capirotada mail piece that went out went out to the wrong people, you member, member?
Well apparently it was a spreadsheet error done by Ramirez that was the source of the problem. I've tried to replicate the issue and I can't figure out how it got screwed up but a source in Rocha's campaign indicated that it was Ramirez that made that costly error.
Ramirez was also handling field work for Yvonne Rosales campaign. Which explains why door lit was bundled for the two candidates.
There you have it people, the sprinkles and the MALI's. Until next campaign season...
Thursday, June 2, 2016
I almost don't know where to start, but lets begin by keeping score. Remember who the people are that have been sticking up for the embattled City Manager all along the way... City Reps Michiel Noe and Emma Acosta. Niland has since seen the light after her initial support for the city manager and Larry Romero, well lets just say he has plenty of time for swanky golf tournaments these days.
I guess over the weekend there was some dust-up over Emma Acosta's effort to try to stack the Ethics Commission with supporters of Tommy Gonzalez. If you don't see that movida for what it is you should let Stevie Wonder drive you around from now on.
Now for all the spin you'll hear the choir of Tommy supporter's come out with, and most especially the bullshit from his attorney Jim Darnell, the fact of the matter remains that through an evidentiary process, in which Gonzalez was able to defend himself and present his own evidence, the Ethics Commission found that his violations rose to the level of a letter of admonishment.
That is a big deal and people are rightfully upset at what he has done.
Council voted to not give him an evaluation this year, and that vote was right before Gonzalez's ethics commission hearing. For all his talk of conspiracies behind every Whataburger with green chile and cheese, where the hell is Paredes on this one?
The majority on council were basically hedging their bets for their boy Tommy. I don't know any other employee of any other type that would be facing a formal hearing and their employer forgo their evaluation before the hearing. Now that there has been findings, and an admission from the then-city rep, can we now stop acting like there aren't major problems with Gonzalez?
But now the pottery barn rule kicks in, you break it, you buy it. So now Noe and Acosta own all the Gonzalez problems, although they basically have from day one when they first led the charge for his obscene raise.
So after a negative result from the Ethics Commission I wonder if they still think he was so deserving of such a ridiculous amount of money for a raise?
It will be interesting to see if city reps now try a backroom scheme to undo what the Ethics Commission did yesterday. I'm betting they will and I'm betting it will be led by either Acosta, Noe, or Robinson (in that order).
Here's the bottom line - the City Manager is in charge of the employees and making the trains run on time. How can he continue to be the City Manager when he's been admonished for not following the rules? How can he expect to be able to admonish his subordinates for infractions in light of the fact they he was found to have done so - and given far more due process than his subordinates are afforded in the process.
No matter how you spin this, Gonzalez has been another black-eye for the City of El Paso. He was part of something that the Ethics Commission would've have recommended removal from office of an elected official (Romero) if he hadn't already resigned.
Seriously, that is really bad.
Final quick blurb about Jim Darnell's assertion that the Commission can't find someone is unintentionally unethical. What the hell kind of bullshit statement is that? Yes, you can be unintentionally unethical.
In what scenario is intention every a defense to breaking a rule? Sorry I was late to work today boss, it was unintentional so you shouldn't write me up. Sorry, I shot the owner of the liquor store I was trying to rob earlier today, it was unintentional.
Give me a break. He's a lawyer and I'm sure he's even said the old cliche that "ignorance of the law is not a defense".
C'mon man, you're supposed to be the big go-to defense lawyer in town and that is your argument?